I dont review a lot of non-fiction, but
for James Lovelock Ill make an exception, especially since this book relates very
much to science and the future. If youve heard of James Lovelock youll no
doubt be aware that he is responsible for the Gaia Hypothesis, the idea that that living
and non-living parts of the Earth form a complex interacting system that can be thought of
as a single organism. Now, while this idea has been embraced by some of the eco-nuts out
there with a religious fervour (all too literally in some cases), they seem much more
reluctant to take some of Lovelocks other ideas on board such as his support
for nuclear power as being safer and far less dangerous to the environment than many
alternatives. The book is, in fact, very much a collection of ideas gathered into chapters
on more-or-less the same subject. I say more-or-less because Lovelock has a tendency to
wander off topic and to reminisce. This is quite understandable, because the man is in his
mid-90s (and if I can think and write as coherently and intelligently as he does at that
age, Ill be impressed).
But it is for those ideas that you should read this book. Lovelock updates
his previous works, bringing his Gaia hypothesis into the 2010s. He addresses the
question of why global warming hasnt been as apparent as expected it comes
down to the fact that we dont understand climate as much as we thought. He muses on
the subject of the lone scientist, and whether the specialisation of much of modern
scientific enquiry is a good thing. He presents the intriguing concept of the Anthropocene
the age of men, with its birth in the invention of the steam engine. But to me, the
most important idea is the one that humans must try to survive through the rough times
ahead, because humans are the mechanism by which Gaia can expand and grow beyond our
Earth. And if that isnt a cool SF concept, I dont know what it is.
|