For the Win is the latest
economic-cum-science fiction novel from the pen of Cory Doctorow, continuing the themes
and style of his previous novel Makers and there is the
rub. If you enjoyed Makers, finding it an unstoppable read, then you will love For
the Win; conversely, if you struggled to get to the end of Makers
then For the Win is not the book for you. For the Win
is set in the near future tomorrow, next year, five years hence, it really
doesnt matter and explores the world of online massive multi-player games
(such as The World of Warcraft), why there are "gold farmers" working in
places such as India, Indonesia and China and how the game owners treat with those
farmers.
For the most part For the Win is an interesting, well
constructed and well paced story, with believable characters in believable situations.
However, and you knew a however was coming, Mr Doctorow is one of those authors who
wont let you forget he has done a significant amount of research and feels the need
to share the fruits of that research with you. So at odd moments the flow of the story is
interrupted with information bombs about the workings and economics of financial markets
and allied fields. These information bombs are perpetrated on the reader in the same
manner in which the old-time engineering-based authors used to riddle their science
fiction with engineering techno-babble; and with the same effects of patronising their
readers and breaking the flow of the story. For me there was also the curious feeling (as
I have more than a passing knowledge of economics and money markets) that Mr Doctorow may
have got it wrong (sometimes subtly, sometimes significantly), which derailed my reading
of the story as I pondered his economic analysis. Whether this pondering the Machiavellian
world of economic game playing was his intention I will leave to the author, all I know is
that it jarred me out of the book sometimes for days at a time. Fortunately, the
way the book is written those information bombs are easy enough to spot when you get to
them.
In short, For the Win was a parsons egg of a book much
more good than bad, but a book that some simple and judicious editing could have been so
much better. If I have a recommendation or the reader its skip the economics
lectures when you come across them in the text as the book reads so much better without
them.
|