It took me a while to figure out why I was
finding this such an unpleasant read. It wasnt so much the violence, the bad
language, or the dark dystopian future. It was that I really didnt like the
viewpoint character. When I thought about it, I realised that given that James is a boy
with "bad genes", suffering from PTSD after being nearly killed in a fire, and
then used as an unsuspecting test subject for experimental drugs, he can be either a
credible character or a likeable character, but not both. Other characters, such as his
artistic roommate Owen, are easier on the nerves, although I failed to understand his
sudden violent outbursts. As for Bethany, shes portrayed as an intelligent girl with
an interesting backstory; and what she sees in James is beyond my comprehension.
There are disagreeable underlying messages here, as well. The villain of
the piece is a scientist, experimenting on the boys, and not in any fashion liable to help
them its the whole "science is bad" syndrome again. Furthermore,
the basic premise that society might attempt to "cure" young males with a
genetic disposition to violence by subjecting them to strict discipline in a
"Goodhouse" seems unlikely. The jury is still out on the whole issue of genetics
and violent behaviour, and I suspect that by the time any connection is proven, more
effective ways to deal with "bad" genes will be available. (Whether or not they
should be used is a whole other issue). So, the book is not much use as science fiction
either and lets not go into Marshalls lack of thought in his
world-building. Essentially, Marshall isnt writing an SF novel, or a YA adventure,
hes writing a polemic against reform schools.
I cant really recommend this book
it left me with such a nasty
taste. But I have no doubt that it will be highly praised in certain circles, and
unsuspecting teenagers will be required to study it.
|