Its hard to know what to do when I am
asked to review the thirteenth and last book of a thirteen book fantasy series which is
evidently very popular among its intended YA audience especially when I
havent read any of the preceding twelve! The first thing was to read it, and this I
did, although I found it not exactly smooth going, in some parts considerably more
engrossing than others.
Delaney does a good job of putting together his sentences, and his grammar
is impeccable, as one would expect from a retired English teacher. But Im still not
sure about the novels overall structure, and whether it provides a satisfying
conclusion to such a long series. A major character dies, and although hes given a
fair bit of exposition, I doubt if the manner of his death is sufficiently heroic for the
fans.
Another thing that did concern me, right at the start, was the map
included at the front, with rivers branching as they flowed down onto the plains from the
mountains rather than the other way round, and those branches ending nowhere in
particular. This was intended to represent a county, somewhere in northern England, at
some point in what felt like the seventeenth century because of the social structure,
apart from the absence of firearms. It is however, a fantasy world, its human population
plagued by boggarts and very old-fashioned witches.
Tom, our lead character, is apprentice to a spook, a person whose job it
is to deal with such incursions of the Dark. He is apparently a teenager still, and prone
to acting without a whole lot of thought it is apparent to the reader that a great
evil cannot be destroyed without another taking its place, but Tom plainly doesnt
get it. Personally, I tend to the theory that "destroying the ultimate evil" is
generally a bad idea when writing fantasy, even if Tolkien did it
And, like in many
of these fantasy worlds, there seems to be no ultimate good to balance it. Why is it so
easy to write about devils, but so hard to write about the divine (God or gods, whatever)?
|